While we’re on the topic, let’s not forget how comparing what was meant to be an hour-long (perhaps one and a half, two?) play to a television series adaptation spanning a likely 26 episodes, is ridiculous. I mean, ridiculous on a scale of comparing all twelve volumes of Death Note to the two 45+ minute movie adaptations and gnashing your teeth while going “THEY TOTALLY SHAFTED THE FANS, I WANT MY MELLO/NEAR/OBSCURE SIDE CHARACTER/ANIME-EXCLUSIVE YAOI FOOT WASHING SCENE”. So let’s not get into that.

Since we’re going for the jugular, why not stop too with the Gonzo bashing for a second to realise that, shock and horror: judging an anime based on its predecessors’ performance, and the animation studio responsible for said predecessors, is pretty dumb. No, maybe exceedingly blind is a better way of putting it. If you thought the KyoAni fans were bad enough, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you a victim of shoddy plot, form over function, exceedingly short-sighted expectations, and jaded cynicism — the Gonzo hater.

I’ll be honest and go out on a limb here to say that hating an animation studio because of its past, and present works failing miserably is quite the immature opinion. Not pointing fingers at nobody, just sayin’. That’s like hating Germany and all its Germans for giving Hitler to the world. Just wanted to put that aside.

Is it obvious, then, that I loved every bit of Romeo x Juliet? This is, in my book, the other clear winner of this season’s selection, putting aside Darker than Black for a moment. Let’s get back to the topic of adaptations that I mentioned at the beginning — they’ve gotten this down to a science, Gonzo has. An adaptation should remain that — just an adaptation. It doesn’t mean that it simply has to follow the original bit by bit if the medium used to project it differs from the original in terms of length or method of presentation — a lot of creative license and common sense should be applied instead.

For the record, I hated the Death Note movies. Gag-inducing and a decadent waste of those three hours of my life, if only for the fact that I read the entire manga beforehand. The problem with adaptations is that the day 1 fans always feel like they got the short end of the stick. Emphasis here on feel. I’m sure that out there somewhere, despite Peter Jackson’s efforts, that there’s a Tolkien fan that felt LOTR needed more elves. Or, regardless of how powerful and lump-in-the-throat inducing the Spiderman movies were, there’s one of them comic buffs wondering how did Parker shot web without that wrist-attachment things he was supposed to invent. You can’t please everybody.

So the old fan will never be satisfied. But what about the new one? Moving Spiderman away from the immense archive of convoluted story arcs lacking a coherent meta-narrative into the immediately accessible sphere of cinema brought about many a new fan, and rekindled old ones to the simplistic charm that held them in the beginning. Bringing Death Note out of its bloated dialogue, and twisted reasoning rooted in cold logic in order to water it down to resemble a cat-and-mouse trailer warmed it to the masses immediately. Honey & Clover, moving and hilarious with its equal parts emotional honesty and situational humour, was made to show the finest points of its brilliance under two hours.

That’s an adaptation for you — not necessarily taking away per se, but removing the barrier that prevents more than just its original audience from picking it up. And this is what Romeo x Juliet is doing, with a quiet, urgent spin on the tale we’ve all come to know and moan about. The epitome of true love. A tragedy wearing its finest.

romeo-x-juliet.jpg
this is the way the show ends — not with a double suicide, but a TRUE END.

Watching Romeo x Juliet hit me with wave after wave of nostalgia. I’m probably the only anime blogger in existence that actually triumphs The Vision of Escaflowne as one of the best anime ever due to its high production values. The concept here a carefully honed aesthetic that permeates every inch of the anime and turns it into an experience. This is what drove me to watch it more than once, to buy the soundtrack CDs and fanboy endlessly about it — a perfect blend of shoujo and shonen, mecha and drama, tragedy and folklore. Romeo x Juliet’s only missing the mecha.

Even the opening sequence resembles the best of two classics. A foreboding text narrative introduction reminiscent of Star Wars? It’s there. A beginning steeped in tragedy with an entire family massacred, not unlike Harry Potter? Ditto. Then before you know it it’s all over, and the OP begins, a delicate rendition of Josh Groban’s.

This proceeds to set the mood for the entire episode, if not series — the harsh images in the opening and the soft, feminine vocals of the OP, which ultimately end with a montage of our hero and heroine lying in a field of flowers, provide a sharp contrast that serves to jolt the viewer out of any preconceptions they might have had. Immediately the viewer is hooked — they think they know the ending, but since the Capulet massacre and Neo Verona have thrown it out of whack, the only other reasonable explanation is for them to take what they see, and hope for a happy ending.

It’s been thought that Romeo and Juliet was all about the romance, yet we’re proven wrong again. The episode begins with what, an alleyway chase? With a mysteriously masked Zorro-like swashbuckler saving an innocent girl from authoritarian tyranny? But I thought you said it was romance, sputters a bewildered now-fan. He hasn’t fully understood what he’s gotten himself into.

Because this is an experience — the consistently detailed animation that demands your attention. The background music that pulls you in like a proper soundtrack should, and leaves you gasping for more in aural ecstasy. The consistent pacing and unconventional premise. And then there’s the world itself. I’ve always had a soft spot for the in-between, something that isn’t quite sci-fi but isn’t quite fantasy, isn’t quite medieval but isn’t quite modern either. The bastard child of steampunk and cyberpunk. Neo Verona fills the shoes of that requirement pretty well — isn’t that a Victorian setting? No, no, it looks more Last Exile to me than anythi- wait, flying horses? When was the last time a setting like this could hold your interest for so long? This is madness…

…this is Gonzo. What were the self-appointed prophets mouthing about them, again? I don’t know. I forget. In the end the only thing that matters to me is how well they’re going to go about this interpretation of The Bard’s work, and they couldn’t have chosen a better way to go about it. I remember Vandread pretty well, Gonzo; I remember the gripping battles above and aboard the Nirvana, the poignance that juggled comedy and drama; I remember hope and loss in a universe of Star Trek proportions; I remember you making a little something that made the teenage me go “wow” with wonder and awe.

The adult me just went “wow” again, and a lot more breath certainly went into that one. Forget the generalizations and accusations levelled against you, all that rubbish about “selling out” was just trashy fan sentiment. You’ve come full circle. Tonight, we dine on quality.

Related Posts by Tags

10 Responses to “Romeo x Juliet being the best, and by best I mean QUALITY, adaptation ever”
  1. says:

    Nay!
    Behold, for Shakespeare’s most noble play spans roughly 3 hours in length (at least, the last performance I saw, I do not know how much was cut)

    I’m not watching Romeo x Juliet because, first of all, Shakespeare himself appears in it (’tis better not be Shakespeare in Love II) and, what the hell, Gonzo added flying unicorns and whatnot?! - And what are they going to do with the obligatory quotes? Translate them to Japanese? Worse than watching Shakespeare in German, I’d say!
    IMO this is really going to far :(
    Some German playwrights do not even allow theaters to alter their work to that degree while still claiming it to be their work, so the theaters can no longer call it an adaption.

    On the other hand, I found Alexandre Dumas’ Le Comt de Monte-Cristo (Gankutsuou, also by Gonzo) quite enjoyable. They messed alot with the ending, but the added “side plots” where well worth it.

    (note: I’ve only seen the R. x J. trailer, I’m just flaming away!)

  2. says:

    >>Behold, for Shakespeare’s most noble play spans roughly 3 hours in length

    Oho, disregard my assumption then. I was ignorant. Also:

    >>I’m not watching Romeo x Juliet because, first of all, Shakespeare himself appears in it
    >>and, what the hell, Gonzo added flying unicorns and whatnot?!

    I didn’t think Shakespeare himself being in the anime affected it at all. He’s just a humorous addition that happens to be be part of the equally quirky cast, I suggest you shouldn’t let that get in your way.

    Regarding the flying horses, well, I certainly thought they fit in with the whole idea of Neo Verona, but I think you should re-read what I said about the world and all that. >:(

    >>And what are they going to do with the obligatory quotes?
    >>Some German playwrights do not even allow theaters to alter their work to that degree while still claiming it to be their work, so the theaters can no longer call it an adaption.

    Nothing. Maybe calling it a remake at this point would better illustrate the extent of R x J if you’re being so finnicky about those things, you hardcore Shakespeare buff you!

    Btw lol @ ger

    >>(note: I’ve only seen the R. x J. trailer, I’m just flaming away!)

    ??? Also cocks. Watch at least ep 1 and be blown away by its AWESOME LEVEL, don’t forget to get the HD version by Shinsen-Subs.

  3. says:

    I went into Romeo and Juliet expecting a dull, uninspired, straight adaptation of the original Shakespearean story. I was more than happily surprised by Gonzo’s anime, it’s definitely one of the more enjoyable anime this season if you see it as just another anime rather than an adaptation of an old piece. Who cares about the flying horses (which actually do fit the setting Gonzo is trying to portray) when everything else about it is done so well!?

    Oh and Hitler wasn’t even born in Germany :p

  4. says:

    I’ll be honest and go out on a limb here to say that hating an animation studio because of its past, and present works failing miserably is quite the immature opinion.

    Uh… I’m going to assume this was a joke I’m not getting, because it certainly seems silly to claim that drawing conclusions based on past experience is a sign of immaturity…

    I’m not watching RxJ, so I won’t bag on it specifically, but I don’t think the idea that I might not enjoy the latest show by a studio whose past output I dislike is somehow outrageous.

  5. says:

    Joe Iglesias: Do you impose value judgments on people for their past deeds instead of looking at what they are? Same thing, really. And I was arguing along different lines when I made that statement — what I meant by that was how you shouldn’t hold an animation studio to its precedents, but rather judge each anime that it produces individually instead of blaming the studio as a whole.

    Maybe KyoAni would’ve been a better comparison if my original statement was confusing. People are holding Lucky Star to Kanon and Haruhi standards even though they’re way different in terms of genre and animation quality required? That’s it, really.

  6. says:

    >>People are holding Lucky Star to Kanon and Haruhi standards

    I think that in general, you’re wrong. I, on the other hand, am holding Lucky Star to Haruhi standards, and it’s meeting them quite exquisitely. You know, the whole sucking thing! :3

  7. says:

    Do you impose value judgments on people for their past deeds instead of looking at what they are?

    Not “instead of”, but “in addition to”, yes. If someone has a clear pattern of behavior and no indication of changing their ways, it’s fair to take that into account, right?

    Lemme try and stay on-topic here. I honestly dislike the vast majority of Gonzo’s work, but I try and keep an open mind, and very occasionally they do manage to put out something I enjoy, like Welcome to the NHK. But one show doesn’t counterbalance all the others they’ve done I absolutely hated, like Hellsing, Saikano, Vandread, Blue Sub Six, Yukikaze, Samurai Seven, and Trinity Blood. I’m not going to declare that RxJ sucks without watching it, but given Gonzo’s general history of doing work I dislike, I’m not going to assume it will please me either. And the buzz I’m hearing isn’t motivating me to try it, so I’m just going to pass. I wouldn’t call that irrational prejudice.

  8. says:

    lolikit: sooo marking your comments as Akismet spam. Which’d make you B& from all of Wordpress.com blogs, lololol

    Joe Iglesias: Let’s put it another way, what I’m talking about is essentially bias. You may claim that it doesn’t influence you, but hey, if I was in your shoes hating every single anime Gonzo’s produced (unfortunately, I don’t) I’d be doing the same too. Your comment seems to contradict itself because you’re saying “no I’m not biased” — then what about these two lines?

    >>But one show doesn’t counterbalance all the others

    Why does it have to? You’re saying that you’re not affected, but why is there a need for “counterbalance” then, if the bad doesn’t outweigh the good and affect your opinion?

    >>but given Gonzo’s general history

    Again, why are you citing precedents? You’re essentially contradicting what you say, and you seem to be in two minds about this. Hope you can elaborate further if I’m misreading what you’re talking about.

  9. says:

    I’m not of two minds about Gonzo at all– I dislike almost all their series that I’ve seen, but I came to that conclusion from actually watching those shows. Why shouldn’t I cite those precedents? It shows that I gave Gonzo several chances to wow me, instead of just relying on conventional wisdom to tell me what I should think. It shows that my opinion of them as a studio is informed.

    By the definition you seem to be using, you’re just as biased, only for Gonzo instead of against– so why claim only the Gonzo haters’ past experience is prejudicial? Internet accusations of bias really mean “I disagree with you but can’t prove you’re wrong,” and this doesn’t seem any different, but the rest of this blog shows that you’re a better thinker than that.

  10. says:

    This is digressing into semantics, we’re not getting through to each other, and I don’t think the meaning behind my original statement was clear enough, even after mentioning it once. Let’s go back up a level — this is what I meant:

    >Anime should be evaluated on an individual basis, not through lumping them in with the past anime that the animation studio responsible for has produced (this is a mature opinion).

    as opposed to the opposite, which was what I wrote

    >>hating an animation studio because of its past, and present works failing miserably is quite (the immature opinion).

    I didn’t elaborate on that in my original post, which was my mistake.

    Now you said:

    >>because it certainly seems silly to claim that drawing conclusions based on past experience is a sign of immaturity…

    You’re saying it’s silly to claim that [drawing conclusions based on past experience is a sign of immaturity] — what exactly are you referring to here? A conclusion about the studio, every work the studio has done, or the anime in question?

    I am responding to that vague point of yours by using the underlying assumption that you’re saying, [it is silly to claim that drawing conclusions about a new anime based on past experiences with the animation studio's works]. The parts in bold can be inferred from the context of your response to my point.

    My reasoning for evaluating anime on an individual basis? The blanket judgement of condemning an entire animation studio is logically unsound. By doing so you’re saying that all genres are the same and target audience are similar — which obviously isn’t the case.

    A practical example in point form:

    - X anime is shounen, Y anime is shoujo, Z anime is comedy
    - XYZ are made by Studio W
    - Viewer sees X anime, hates it since it’s generic shounen, goes “Studio W SUCKS since they made X anime that sucks, surely Y anime and Z anime must suck too!”

    Or in a reason/conclusion format, this is what is being said:

    1) X anime sucks
    2) Studio W made X anime
    3) Therefore, all the anime that Studio W makes sucks.

    A logical fallacy if I ever saw one.

Leave a Reply

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.