what-she-said.jpg
this screencap is justice, like Light

So after watching the entire season, let’s talk about what I think of Azumanga Daioh. It didn’t improve after the first episode, but considering the pathetic waste of time that was most of the series, I guess that was to be expected.

Azumanga Daioh is, at best, an average show. At worst, it’s like Charlie Chaplin trying to cheer up a little girl post-rape with his legendary slapstick humour, which is technically funny, but really sad when you look at the bigger picture.

The characters tried to be interesting. They’re not like anyone I’ve ever known, and if I knew people who had over-the-top, made-for-anime personalities like them I’d kick them in the nuts. Or uterus. Watching the series’ attempts to be funny was like seeing a clown who, having failed his Degree in Laughology, is trying to make a kid with terminal cancer smile, only he fails big time since not only has the kid got cancer, yesterday his parents died in a car accident and his sister’s in the ICU ward down the hall. With the exception of Chiyo, the entire cast was clichd shit, and since shit is as shit does I don’t think I need to go into detail (also, because making jokes about shit is, well, shit).

The jokes came non-stop, and since they weren’t exactly funny, I found the series to be grating on my nerves. One reason I didn’t find them funny was because they were forced, and the jokes weren’t an extension of the characters, rather, the jokes were the characters themselves, and when you’ve got a series centred around the jokes instead of the characters the whole thing becomes forgettable. At times I thought they could’ve done with less attempts at stupid surrealism (Chiyo-chichi stuck out like a sore thumb and never was explained, for example) and even more random attempts at moe humour, aka Kaorin and her stupid yuri antics, or Sakaki and her damn cat complex.

The other reason why the jokes just didn’t cut it for me was how everything was too contrived. Everything was setup to have humour in it even if there wasn’t, even Kimura’s antics which would be illegal and considered sexual harassment in real life. The reason why Lucky Star is so funny is because it has humour I could relate to for once, not something so removed from reality like Azumanga that all I could do was laugh at the characters for being a pale imitation of reality, not with the characters for being actually funny. All the Azumanga cast did was make fun of Osaka, physical humour, slapstick humour, make fun of Chiyo’s age difference, more slapstick humour; all with the assistance of two-dimensional characters. Imagine at this point that I’m going to strengthen my argument by comparing an anime series made in Japan for a Japanese audience to a sitcom made in American for American audience, but since straw man arguments are retarded I’ll just digress instead.

dark-konata.jpg
this is representative of the awesomeness of DARK KONATA.

Another area in which Lucky Star succeeds but Azumanga Daioh fails is sound. Lucky Star’s focus isn’t on the music, and neither does the music make you feel like you’re watching a bloody musical about high school kids (High School Musical? haven’t seen that though). The same stupid tunes are repeated as a theme everywhere in Azumanga as if to remind you that you’re not watching a high school comedy, you’re watching something that tries to be high school comedy but fails and instead has randomly surreal scenes with sound effects thrown in to underscore its unimpressive mediocrity. One could say that the music, like Azumanga’s characters, are cheesy and lame.

I suggest that if you like Azumanga, own the DVDs, and/or have watched it numerous times and still find it funny, you’re a fanboy that should end your life whenever you get the chance to, if you choose to compare it to a series of an evidently different make whose definition you’re trying to squeeze to suit your argument.

I also suggest that you read Yotsuba&! and laugh at the shit that was Azumanga Daioh, because not only is it still slice of life and comedy, it lacks the high school part and retains only a Chiyo-sque character, which was the only thing that Kiyohiko Azuma retained from his Azumanga cast, which could also imply how Chiyo was the only character worth anything in the series.

What I want to say and have been saying since the beginning of this post is, that comparing Azumanga Daioh to Lucky Star is an obtuse exercise. Obtuse because it’s trying to compare oranges to lemons (ooh, look, I’m working an allusion about the singers of the OP and ED of Azumanga into my analogy, that makes me smart, witty, and funny when I point it out in brackets) — all because they’re citruses and fruit doesn’t make them any similar. And I can’t take back my eight-odd hours of life that I spent watching Azumanga, but there’s no use crying over spilt milk. Yotsuba&! is still awesome, but I’m by no means a fanboy of either.

P.S. Anyone else didn’t find Azumanga as funny as the fanboys make it out to be? I was definitely one of them; I remember laughing ten times more at Ouran High School Host Club than I did at Azumanga. Am I the only one, please tell me I am so I can feel special with my elitist anime tastes, don’t wreck my day, will you…

P.P.S. My opinion of Azumanga Daioh will never change, so don’t expect me to post anymore about this unless I’m blasting it to pieces as a result of another straw man post somewhere out there in the blogosphere.

P.P.P.S. This was a parody of this post in case you didn’t realise. Few points to keep in mind though: I really hate Azumanga for not being as funny as everyone said it was. My thoughts about Azumanga are representative about what I think of the series, not written for the sake of it. I didn’t watch three episodes of Azumanga either, I watched the whole season before rubbishing it. Beat that.

P.P.P.P.S. Tsubaki, I wouldn’t call it ignorance, more of his inability to come up with a coherent and logical argument for comparing Azumanga Daioh to Lucky Star, which was what his post was centred on. Wait, that’s ignorance too, isn’t it? Well, maybe he’s illogical and ignorant, then.

Related Posts by Tags

17 Responses to “On Azumanga Daioh: Retrospective @ Series”
  1. says:

    Thanks for liking my post so much that you took out the time to write a whole parody post on it.

  2. says:

    Don’t flatter yourself too much, kid. Not everyone on the internet’s as angry as you, if you get what I mean.

  3. says:

    Aww… look who’s embarrassed. It’s okay to love me, c’mon here.

  4. says:

    lol, I think you are a little overly critical in your words. I do not agree with your arguments about Azumanga, particularly the nature of jokes which I feel is not exactly the best slapstick humor, but it’s done decently well considering that jokes are usually in or out, up to one’s perspective. Nevertheless, comedies often suffer when you don’t get the context, and that is perhaps why Lucky Star is not funny for me personally when I watch it. Still, on your p/s comments on the direct personal inference of my co-blogger requires a bit of tact is. Personal attacks really do not go too well, and I hope you will refrain from it somewhat, because I find it to be unflattering of the author in charge.

    Yes, it’s the internet and we can be scolding anyone ignorant/illogical, simply from an article that is written, but I believe it does not show well on you too. I hope that you criticize an article, and not the person. I have my off days, as well as my on days in writing too, and it is not nice when you have a bad entry, and people call you ridiculous and retarded, is it not? The content should be the one analyzed, and not the author.

    I apologize, but I guess some of your strong words directed to my co-blogger is a bit impolite. I feel that your criticism of his writing is fair though with your decent argument, if anything, even if I disagree with it.

    Cheers and enjoy :)

  5. says:

    Impz: I didn’t savage Azumanga for the sake of the parody, I’ve always had issues with it, and I hope you can accept that I found Ouran funnier, and Lucky Star too. :(

    Thing is the only personal attack I’ve done is call what he’s written illogical (Tsubaki called him ignorant, I was just adding on). And I’m willing to stand by those terms — if you care to hear me out on this. A few points he made actually.

    1. A series can be said to be “shit” after 3 episodes.
    2. Lucky Star is comparable to Azumanga Daioh.

    Note that I made careful mention of how I watched all of Azumanga before I passed judgement on it. That’s something I evidently found lacking in his post — Lucky Star’s run isn’t over yet. I’m sure you get that point, though.

    Second thing, and the main reason I think poorly about those opinions out there, and not just Lupus’ — it’s not in the same league as Azumanga. Technically it is, but if you stop at the surface of things you’re not going to get anywhere. I mentioned before in my very first post that it’s short-sighted to do so (i.e. compare directly) because of how it’s executed.

    And my predictions about it were true. The execution of Lucky Star differs greatly from Azumanga in that the focus is a lot more on the slice of life than anything; in fact, comparing it to Ichigo Mashimaro wouldn’t be unreasonable given how it’s way more character-centric than Azumanga will ever be. Hence why everyone’s been barking up the wrong tree, IMHO, and the comparison is definitely unjustified.

    >>(remember, Im writing in an English blog targeted at an English audience. If you tell me that I fail because the show is targeted at a Japanese audience, I WILL delete your comment. You have been warned)

    Also, Lupus clearly has some attitude issues with his stance. How is the statement he threatens to censor not true in any way? Anime has always been made with their target market in mind, all because they’re pandering to their demographic and not a bunch of opinionated bloggers in the Western hemisphere doesn’t make it any less of an anime. Trying to censor out those who might bring that up doesn’t leave me in very high opinion of what he wrote, to be honest. Hence my equally derogatory satire.

    I too agree that the content should be analysed and not the author, but I’d like to point out that the term “illogical” can refer both ways — to the writer or his written work. And while I admit I was calling him illogical, I also had his writing in mind when I made that statement, because I’m of the opinion it’s justified, again, through his censorship and aggressive stance that refuses to actually discuss the matter at hand without seeming like an angry blogger with issues. It goes hand in hand — illogical writing is the result of an illogical person.

    Hope we can talk about this more in the comments, if you like.

  6. says:

    Ooh, Owen X Lupus yaoi. With trap impz in the middle.

    This is unprecented serious affair! Three men yaoing like there is no tomorrow!

    PS: I want you inside me.

    PPS: I really want you inside me.

    PPPS: LOL @ post.

    PPPPS: impz I want to rape you so hard.

  7. says:

    Arrr, I am personally fine with any criticism, don’t get me wrong. You can literally flame the living lights out of Lupus’s writing but I just cannot tolerate any comments on the author itself. :) Nevertheless, you have your opinions about criticism and I have mine.

    The term in itself, “iilogical”, does mean both ways but I will prefer it to be more objective in the sense of the writing, rather than personal attacks. Even if it’s intended, it does not look well. I will not agree or disagree upon the article, because to me, Azumanga Daioh and Lucky star are not my favorite genre, and to comment upon it without firm knowledge will simply display me as ignorant. Heh heh.

    Nevertheless, I hope that you can see that I protect my co-bloggers whenever they are under personal attack, yet I will never request or delete any comments of flaming, since I respect the freedom to expression.

    @DRM: ouch….i know :)

  8. says:

    Hrm… the post does seem to be a bit inflammatory, but it doesn’t seem like anything too serious on the other hand. I liked Azumanga Daioh, and I’m liking Lucky Star as well. I don’t see the point in comparing the two shows so strongly either, so it’s nice to see that others seem to agree with it. I’m kinda surprised that Lucky Star is still leaving such impressions from people.

  9. says:

    I’m laughing at how you’re saying I can’t compare Lucky Star to Azumanga Daioh because they’re targeted at different audiences, but I can’t write an opinion on Lucky Star targeted at an audience that won’t like it because the show isn’t targeted at them. So it’s okay to cite different audiences as a reason for judging one thing when it’s in your favour, but not when it isn’t? Do I smell hypocrisy?

    I will judge a show whenever I want to. If I find it lacking after 3 episodes, and that it doesn’t hold my interest, I will say so and drop it. I’m not stupid enough to make myself suffer through 10 hours of drudge in order to justify my opinion against someone else’s.

    And you’ve lost all credibility to me by saying that Azumanga Daioh isn’t character centric and slice of life. Did you really watch the whole show?

  10. says:

    Lupus:
    >>at how youre saying
    >>theyre targeted at different audiences

    Could you point out where I said that exactly, please? Your words, not mine. Maybe you need a bit of help with the difference between execution of and target audience because I don’t recall saying anything about a target audience. Hope you weren’t writing that with a scowl on your face so bad you couldn’t read what I wrote properly.

    >>I will judge a show whenever I want to.

    Your choice, just as it is mine to comment about how flawed I think that thinking is. Because 3 episodes are totally the sum of 26, nevermind how it’s been proven time and again that reasoning doesn’t hold water. You’re probably one of those fans who’re going to jump back on Lucky Star the moment FMP’s director starts on episode 5, though, so I guess we don’t really need to discuss that.

    >>And youve lost all credibility to me by saying that Azumanga Daioh isnt character centric and slice of life.

    I like how your selective reading blinds you to any and all important points I’ve made so far. This is also why I think you’re rather illogical, let’s see; back to quoting what I said earlier:

    >The execution of Lucky Star differs greatly from Azumanga
    >the focus is a lot more on the slice of life
    >comparing it to Ichigo Mashimaro wouldnt be unreasonable
    >how its way more character-centric than Azumanga will ever be

    So tell me. Were you frothing at the mouth when you were writing a reply, or did those lines genuinely fly over your head? I had a smirk on mine throughout, and I think it’d be in everyone’s interest if you actually focused on what I’ve been saying.

    Btw, I highlighted the parts where you might have trouble reading in case your selective dyslexia strikes again. It’d be great to have you focus on the sentences I write as a whole and not just pay attention to certain phrases which you then twist into something with different meaning from what I’ve said. It’s getting a bit obvious if you ask me.

  11. says:

    drmchsr0: Best LOL I had all day, thanks. Love the IN allusion.

    Impz: Alright, I can see that. Will focus on the article, and thanks a lot for your imput. Glad to see there’s people out there who can still keep a level head, anyway. (:

    TheBigN: You’re seriously not kidding me, are you. Everyone’s still comparing it to Azumanga, and will always do so as long as they see COMEDY + HIGH SCHOOL in the equation, because they’re too lazy to see beyond the initial genres they’re lumped in. I pride myself on being the minority, with good reason, in any case.

  12. says:

    Just saw this post.
    I’m officially drowning you now for various offenses including, but not limited to:
    a. poking fun of one of my loyal supporters
    b. preferring Lucky Star to Azumanga Daioh
    c. being dumb

    As Encyclopedia Dramatica taught me, “when she does it wrong, drown the bitch.”

  13. says:

    >>Im officially drowning you now

    Fails for Evanescence reference, whatever you say is automatically null and void. Lachrymose more, etc.

  14. says:

    >>Fails for Evanescence reference

    The fact that you made a connection doesn’t necessitate my awareness of there being one; I was not making references to this entity of which you speak and of which I know nothing save your proclamation of fail. You dug yourself a hole so go die in it.

  15. says:

    >>The fact that you made a connection doesnt necessitate my awareness of there being one

    One word: Freud. One link: here.

    I knew good would come out of staying awake a little while more. Figures Shinsen releases DtB 06 when I’m at the end of my tether. Good night.

  16. says:

    >>One word: Freud. One link: here.

    /me drowns the bitch

  17. fingerfish says:

    lucky star is boring and very predictable.
    i especially dont like the lucky channel segment. the akira’s real personality gag is overused and became stale after a few episodes.

Leave a Reply

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.