If there was one fault I could attribute to the first season now that it’s all over, it would have to be the cliffhangers, assuming that while some cliffhangers are indeed faults, not all faults are cliffhangers. One day on IRC amidst the usual verbal diarrhoea TJ of Riuva fame wondered aloud if Code Geass was the pinnacle of mecha anime, and although his statement was buried in a deluge of anal statements shortly after it got me thinking.

geass-star.jpg
the first rule of parody fanart is that Lucky Star makes anything funny

To begin with, it’s short-sighted to compare Code Geass to Evangelion when talking about the pinnacle of mecha, which would be like comparing the proverbial apples to oranges. This stems from the two subsets present within the mecha genre, of which I’ll name Symbiote and Vehicle respectively:

The Symbiote has the mecha possessing varying levels of sentience — in anime like these the focus inevitably lies with or on the mecha, which is regarded as a separate character. The protagonist will then form a bond with said mecha, whether physical, psychological, or, in Evangelion’s case, Oedipal; cue existential monologues and/or insights into said pilot’s psyche throughout the series. Shows that fall into this category include FLCL, Brain Powerd, Rahxephon, Gigantic Formula.

Then there’s the Vehicle mecha, which is the subset that Code Geass falls into. Like its namesake, it basically uses the mecha as a means to an end — it’s first and foremost a means by which to resolve conflict, also usually a driving point of the show. Instead of the mecha-centric emphasis that the Symbiote subset falls into, the focus here lies on the pilot or faction that said pilot belongs to. Shows that fall into this category include the Gundam and Macross series, Vandread, Overman King Gainer, Bokurano.

Naturally, when it comes to the man on the street and mainstream accessibility, the Vehicle mecha almost always has the upper hand, which also explains the success of the Gundam franchise. Assuming a background where the viewer watches little, or practically no mecha anime, it’s certainly much easier to identify with a human pilot than an alien giant robot swathed in mysticism and the vaguest of symbols.

This is where, in my opinion, Code Geass scores its first victory: a case of less being more. CG eliminates most, if not all of the mecha archetypes and stigma an audience unfamiliar with the genre is likely to judge it with by putting the characters first. In the first episode, for all of Kallens efforts to hijack a Knightmare and Jeremiahs subsequent pursuit in his Glasgow, the audience is already alerted to CGs true intentions; they know giant robot battles arent going to be the focus here.

Instead of thrusting the viewer in what could have been an all-out (read: confusing) battle between the Japanese resistance and the Britannian army, we have instead personal insight into what makes our protagonist Lelouch tick, right from the first episode. We know hes talented, bored, and privileged. The quintessential playboy, infused with intelligence and refined with good looks. We also know somethings going to happen to him before the end of the episode.

What proceeds to play out, however, isnt him obtaining a mecha to crush the oppressive Britannian empire, like one would predict. Its at this point that he receives the Geass, and things are turned upside-down. What on earth was that? Did he just order those soldiers to kill themselves? Wasnt that green-haired girl dead? The immediate perception of this being a mecha anime is broken, if not lost. The next time a mecha appears on the protagonists side for a full-blown battle? Ten whole episodes later.

The point Im trying to make here is that CG is more mecha than any of its Vehicle counterparts through being less mecha — i.e., a back to basics. Vehicle mecha has always been about the pilot and those behind the pilot, and CG wastes no time letting us know the sum of what theyre made of. Were introduced in rapid succession to the blindly loyal and idealistic Suzaku Kururugi, alongside the headstrong, yet vulnerable Kallen Stadtfelt through extensive character development that, again, all happens before the eleventh episode.

Why the eleventh episode? Its here that Suzaku and Kallen finally do battle in their respective mecha, and the viewer is all the better for it. Its not mecha porn were seeing here — two gigantic suits of armour going at it for the sake of the audience — its two people fighting for their beliefs and convictions, their creed and ideology driving the conflict; one believing that change should come from within, the other one believing the opposite.

Its what Vehicle mecha should always be. Lets admit it — mecha is as much a fetish as it is a genre, and theres nothing more gratifying to the long-time fan than seeing mechanical behemoths duking it out in the name of world domination, faction superiority, or something in-between. Character development? Story? Who really cares? To them, the more mecha the better. A sense of appraisal charged by the lust for missiles, cannons, and laser beams to the point where its almost pornographic.

But new viewers dont care as much about the trappings of mecha as they do the story itself. The same can be said of virtually any show looking to expand its audience beyond the usual hardcore following they have — first-time viewers dont care about the frills on the present or the icing on the cake, they care more about whats within and beneath. CG, in its exhaustive brilliance, has proven that this isnt particularly hard to do, and it has my praise for that reason alone.

jeremiah-the-hairdresser.jpg
the second rule is that if you can’t follow the first, OOC representations work too

The second victory is no less significant: an everyman appeal that isnt skin-deep. After watching countless anime tailored specifically for particular audiences, CG is comforting in its shameless mass appeal. Theres the previously mentioned mecha. Pretty girls abound. If youre into pretty guys, then thats fine too, because two main characters, along with a half-dozen or so side ones, happen to satisfy that. Youre into romance, you say? Or action? Its all there. Theres even a sizzling hot magical girl with a penchant for pizza as a bonus.

However, what makes it better is how its not even close to being a jack of all trades. Master of none, you say? Make that master of all. The lovelorn Shirley Fenette blossoms from generic annoyance to painful tragedy in the span of a few episodes. The rise of Lelouch Lamperouge from helpless student to the leader of a rebellion would be something Victor Hugo would have been proud of. The insane pacing each episode goes through rivals that of Deathly Hallows, and the mecha battles? Agile, lithe, and, like the Transformers movie, just what youd expect of mecha in this day and age.

I once likened CG to being a sleek amalgam of Gundam Seed and Death Note. I still like to think that its almost that, when you strip it down to its bare essentials; a young prodigy with a good grasp of logic, combined with faction politicking driven by mecha and a pretty cast to top it all off. In my re-watching of CG in anticipation of the season finale, however, Ive noticed that for all its bang and glitter, it has pathos binding it all together. If Darker than Black is a mournful reflection of human existence, then Code Geass shows us the pain that comes with searching for survival and belonging.

C.C. sums it up nicely at the end of episode 25 with her monologue, reminding us that Lelouchs actions are ultimately driven by his desire for a safe place for his sister to live in, and avenging his sisters death, no matter how much blood he spills on the way. In the same way too do the other characters reveal similar aspirations — Kallen shoulders the death of her brother and the imprisonment of her mother; C.C., despite her immortality, longs to remember and be remembered; Suzaku turns against his former fellow countrymen by serving the Britannia empire and is cold-shouldered by both sides in the process.

So can Code Geass be considered the pinnacle of mecha, when alls said and done? Id like to think that thats the case, and while it still has the occasional detractor decrying its supposed flaws, I take comfort in knowing no work goes without its share of critics, and thats enough for me to continue to extol its virtues for a long time. I see the ante of the future — its higher than it used to be, and its there thanks to this ingenious invention of Sunrise.

Related Posts by Tags

13 Responses to “Code Geass as the pinnacle of mecha: A two-fold victory of magnificence”
  1. Owen S says:

    Also, a footnote for anyone wondering about my lack of posts this week: I’m not experiencing burnout. My wrists and hands are, though, and I do recognise the symptoms of carpal tunnel and RSI quite well. Hope that clears things up some. Pleased to add that the pain has lessened significantly after long breaks between usage, but I’ve still got a long way to go with regards to normalcy.

  2. 0rion says:

    @Owen

    No worries, take care of yourself! Carpal tunnel is no joke, and can take a long time to heal, so don’t push yourself. I for one don’t plan on going anywhere.

  3. Ivan says:

    The quality of fanart images you place in your posts amaze me! They look like the original. I wonder if you make them yoursef.

  4. Shirukii says:

    Nice article, albeit a tad long. You should provide a summary section for those with shorter attention spans, I myself almost filed this under tl;dr, but managed to make it through because it was quite an interesting read.

    Watch out for that RSI, it can be quite the painful experience if not addressed quickly.

  5. jpmeyer says:

    So basically, Code Geass is the pinnacle of mecha because the mecha aspects of the show are reduced to ornamentation?

    This is only partially related to your post, but I dunno; I’m always wary of evaluations of a generic work (and by “generic” I mean “belonging to a genre” rather than “cliched”) where it is deemed as being good or bad based on the presence of things like symbolism or character psychology (which is really an outgrowth of the 19th century novel) rather than elements of that genre.

    To put this another way, think about applying the criteria of genres other than “drama” to a generic work. Nobody would claim that a comedy wasn’t good because it lacked musical numbers, or that a musical was bad because it lacked gore, but the presence or lack of elements of the “drama” genre in another genre can make an unrelated genre work good or bad.

  6. Karry says:

    “The Symbiote has the mecha possessing varying levels of sentience in anime like these the focus inevitably lies with or on the mecha, which is regarded as a separate character.”

    Duh, so Venom is suddenly a mecha ?
    Evangelion is certainly not belong to a mecha genre, never did and never will.

  7. Martin says:

    I came to the conclusion that some mecha shows don’t use the mecha as merely hardware or props in a physical sense, since the sight of a giant robot looks a bit incongruous in an everyday setting (Gasaraki is one impressive exception, however). Instead, what I think is a clever piece of writing is how the mecha is used as a metaphor or, at the very least, a symbol or plot device to convey an idea or theme outside of ’shiny machines doing cool stuff’. I don’t know if there’s a proper term for such things so maybe I’m not making myself very clear…

    Ok, Eva is a good example. The mecha (or artificial life-form…whatever) is a physical entity that is involved in physical events in the story, but has sympbolic significance - that of the main character’s pent-up insecurity and frustration. Similarly, the RahXephon is also a physical object, but is a channel of sorts to convey Ayato’s thoughts and feelings.

    I only got onto this train of thought after trying to justify how mecha can be shown in film and TV, without looking stupid. If nothing else I’ve said makes sense, at least one of you intelligent folks could run with the idea and make a sensible article out of it. :P

  8. Moogy says:

    You know, I don’t even really think of Code Geass as mecha anymore. It merges politics, psychological drama, mecha (lol), fantasy, sci-fi, school life, romance, and more all so effectively that I find it quite difficult to shoehorn it into any of the genres. I suppose I would have to call it mecha were I forced to generalize it, however…

    You know, I haven’t actually watched any of the Gundam series. Got any recommendations?

  9. Man O' Brass says:

    I only recently finished Code Geass. I didn’t want to watch it until it was done. In fact the less I knew, the better.

    Lelouch milks the invisible cow for all of the delicious 2% chocolate milk in the world. Not for evil, not for power, but for good! To hold the world in his loving, yet iron, fist. I found myself entranced by this show and agree that it hits upon all of the things that make a show truly great. It runs by the numbers and executes them all perfectly. It was like watching a russian olympic gymnast, technical merit and heart composed into a cold shell that burns with the inner fire of pride and love for its work.

    HOWEVER, Code Geass was not, by any stretch of the imagination, a Mecha show. Despite the fact that giant robots were used, as was said, as a means to an end, I feel that the mean was merely an excuse to explain both the defeat of japan and provide a situation in which people are disengaged from the immediate responses of their actions. Lelouch has the ability to monologue only because the mecha is a barrier between him and the world.

    I would go so far as to say there is a correlation between sunglasses in cyber-punk fiction and mecha in anime.

    Nay this is something else on its own and separate from anything but the most light brushes of categorization into genre, transcending the boundaries that keep the creativity of most shows trapped.

  10. Dorian Cornelius Jasper says:

    To start off, I think the division between “Symbiote” and “Vehicle” is a bit artificial. It doesn’t dislodge the traditional “Real Robots” vs. “Super Robots” comparison so much as it points something out:

    I curse Gainax for inspiring the “Post-Evangelion” robot show.

    As far as Robot shows go, Geass is like a late-era Gundam series–natural, considering this *is* Sunrise we’re talking about–in that it dresses itself up in the trappings of a Real Robot show, but doesn’t take the “Real” part very seriously. By which, I mean, it doesn’t much emphasize that the robots are military war machines, and doesn’t treat them as though they were the tactical equivalent advanced tanks or fighter jets. Like recent Gundam series, the military verisimilitude aspect of early Real Robot shows is practically non-existent, only showing up at poorly-defined and simply plot-convenient moments. Often with logic loopholes involved.

    So… I hate to be the old grognard again, but… I wouldn’t quite call Geass a robot show. It’s more of a show that has robots in it. And Evangelion isn’t so much a robot show as it is a deconstruction of the robot show genre. Though it *has* influenced shows after it, hence the concept of the Post-Evangelion robot show. Which would include every single “Symbiote” series you’d mentioned.

    As most can probably tell, people don’t actually take the old dichotomy of Real vs. Super robot very seriously nowadays when making a show. So most “mecha series” you’ll find nowadays will be, in some form or another, a “show with robots in it” as opposed to a show that emphasizes the machines in a military (Real) or superheroic (Super) capacity. And there’s always the next Post-Evangelion show. (If a robot has biological eyes, it’s guaranteed Post-Eva.)

    Of course, my favorite show of all time happens to be a “show with robots in it”–Escaflowne. Which is to say that there’s nothing wrong with being that kind of show, but it’s a bit misleading to call a show a “mecha series” when, ultimately, the robots are plot *devices* rather than plot *enablers.*

    You can tell when the robots are plot devices when you could do a hard mad-lib replacement of every robot or robot-related incident with _______ and the show would be largely unchanged, though it’d look different and be marketed accordingly. (Fill-in-the-blank samples: magic, psychic powers, monsters, helicopters, computer programs, rocket skates, and so forth.)

    A show that uses robots as plot enablers, on the other hand, tries to be more thoughtful in its application of the “robot element.” If one were to remove the robots from this sort of show, it changes dramatically beyond simple genre marketing. If one were to try to preserve the plot of a show like this, then removing the robots and replacing them with some other element would involve much more re-writing, and checking for logical loopholes that might emerge from such a substitution. Shows that treat robots as plot enablers don’t just use them as an excuse to move the plot forward, or simply as a source of interesting battles (though obviously that’s part of it). These sorts of shows take robots and derive inspiration from them. (Evangelion would count, being as it’s a thorough deconstruction of the genre as a whole. So much so that some folks refuse to call it a robot show. =D )

    The “plot device” and “plot enabler” concept applies more to elements of shows than to shows themselves, but I had to give my two cents and say that robots aren’t a very important part of Code Geass at all. And neither is narrative restraint or fiercely logical storytelling. But it’s still fun.

    –Dorian C. Jasper

  11. Dorian Cornelius Jasper says:

    Sorry for the double-post.

    “Like recent Gundam series, the military verisimilitude aspect of early Real Robot shows is practically non-existent, only showing up at poorly-defined and simply plot-convenient moments.”

    Replace *early* with *late.* I blame the rush to leave for work on this error.

  12. oL says:

    Code Geass focuses much more on fighting tactics than Evangelion. Overall, it feels more like Death Note to me. Both protagonists have super powers and they are smart.

  13. nirai kanai » Blog Archive » Germany lost, I’m sad, and other things (namely, meeting Satoshi Kon and Macross). says:

    [...] remember Owen S labeling Macross as a mecha centric show, differentiating it from Code Geass, which, in his words, was a Vehicle mecha. While I’m [...]

Leave a Reply

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.