The comments on this post were cute. Specifically, though, I’d like to commend Higevs, Xerox, and lKnight for taking the bait. My mention of “magnum opus” was deliberately provocative, utterly random, though not without careful forethought and really a point I meant to expand on in this post; it was interesting, other post comments aside, to see what the term really means to each of them, and how their taste influenced their criteria for such judgement.

tengen-toppa-sketch.jpg
while light shows juxtaposed on serious ones make for hilarity…

Here’s the plan for my blogging of this series: having read practically every post about GL, I noticed one thing in common — practically nothing was said as everyone went into the blogger’s equivalent of cat proximity, which was basically posting screencaps of what happened during the episode while employing choice, eloquent, and concise vocabulary consisting entirely of phrases like “THIS WAS EPIC!!!”, “GAR”, and “I CRIED MANLY TEARS”, rather than offering any coherent dissection or discussion. Not like I’m judging or anything, just how I saw it.

It goes without saying then that I plan to blog this, and split this task of blogging up into three arcs of my own making, the sum of which will be arc 1 (episodes 1-9), arc 2 (episodes 10-18), and arc 3 (episodes 19-27), which will also serve as the final review. As editorial blogs are generally renowned for having an unsystematic blogging structure, I thought I’d change this by organising things a little, so that my readers know what to expect and whatnot.

With that in mind, let’s tackle the magnum opus bit first. Going by dictionary definitions wouldn’t hurt, since I’m a man of words and all that –the general meaning gleaned from the term would be construed as meaning a work of particular importance, something that doesn’t necessarily have to be the best (my question here is, who on earth’s judging? the Magnum Opus Committee? the United Taste Organisation?), but great enough to warrant it the term. In other words, a work that you particularly like for being brilliant.

It would be good to note at this point that I already have the impression of GL being Gainax’s magnum opus, at least from the collective Anglosphere opinion, which was unanimous in critical acclaim for the most part. Yes, my impression of whether this is Gainax’s magnum opus, because this is my blog, and for the sake of sanity and discussion I could really care less about what you think, although you can mention it in the comments. I’ll be raising this question again in my final post, the answer of which I hope to find during the viewing of the series.

My reason for doing so is this: the concept of trying to define a magnum opus is as fruitful and productive as trying to decide on what the “Best anime ever made” is. Magnum opus by what standards? Depth? Entertainment? Critical acclaim? Commercial acclaim? All of the above, and more? Which aspect should be give the most weight, if any at all? This task also happens to be made more difficult given the length and breadth of Gainax’s works, so any definition of magnum opus is best narrowed down to what my opinion of it is.

Having established my premise from which I’m going to blog about GL, here’s my initial impressions: it’s very familiar. This isn’t my discounting the setting and world in which it’s based, which is of course original material; it’s just that the base outline of it is like that word on the tip of your tongue, a momentary lapse of concentration in which you can’t really think of what you have in mind, yet can at the same time.

A decade or so of shounen and mecha might have played a part in this. My reason for believing Code Geass as Sunrise’s magnum opus is that it left practically no base, genre, or fetish uncovered in its capacity as an anime; ditto KyoAni’s Haruhi to a lesser extent. No, I don’t give a Gundamn about the other shows — do I really have to see them to pass judgement? Nostalgia blinds, and I’d rather not. Does Haruhi have everything I like about anime in 14 episodes? Yes. Did CG remind me of the same in 25? Yes.

code-nia-what-is-a-man.gif
…so do serious ones (”Mao!” “What is a human?!”)

I see the same thing happening with GL. The branding is slick but effective — an alpha male that dies early, a protagonist that struggles with his destiny yet grows into another cast of said alpha male, a phallic symbol in the form of a drill that oozes sheer masculinity. The end result is an uncompromising mix of shounen and mecha adhering to its core values that practically screams to be watched by its target demographic, a show that surpasses even the usual boundaries of anime when you realise that for once, you don’t have to be ashamed of watching this.

The masculinity aspect is important due to how the typical otaku would be far from being the epitome of manliness — Kamina’s death isn’t an end, but the means towards an end that helps endear the viewer to the show. His death has a two-fold purpose: firstly, it develops Simon’s character to the extent of becoming a replacement for Kamina, and prepares him for the leadership role in the Gurren Brigade; secondly, it helps the viewers identify with Simon as he grows as a character. Cruel as it may sound, Kamina’s role in the show would be like the training wheels on a bicycle; no one starts off without them, and everyone has to say goodbye to them at some point.

It shows acumen in a saturated industry where almost every cliché, shounen ones in particular, have been played to death. In an amusing parallel with Evangelion about pre-mecha piloting jitters, Simon’s initial lack of confidence made for a brilliant contrast to Shinji’s “I mustn’t run away! I mustn’t run away!” outbursts — instead of being chastised for it, Simon is consoled and reassured. Similarly, Kamina isn’t aspiring to, or apologetic about his maleness like characters of similar persuasion usually are — he is a man, through his actions, thoughts, speech, and various idiosyncrasies.

This is the driving force behind GL, and it makes no apologies about what feminists would essentially brand as phallocentric. While there is a tendency for characters to have their mannish natures as just another character attribute, Kamina makes it his, and in turn the Gurren Brigade’s credo. He isn’t doing it because he thinks it’s right, he’s doing it because it’s part of who he is, and he couldn’t be able to sleep at night if he didn’t have it otherwise.

Likewise, the drill as a recurring symbol is particularly brilliant for having several meanings at once. Having reconciled Kamina as the epitome of masculinity beforehand, his constant tirade about drilling to the heavens mean that we associate the drill with justice, freedom, progress, and basically everything that Kamina stands for. While originally used as a tool by Simon, he now uses it to liberate the world from the clutches of the Helix King, and as a result the battles are exciting not only due to the choreography, hat’s at stake, or the characters behind them, but also thanks to the subconscious programming employed in which we naturally associate the good side as the one with the drill, and evil as the one without.

That isn’t to say that GL has been without faults so far. If there was anything that would make me reconsider the magnum opus title, it would be the avoidable mistakes that Gainax made with episodes 04 and 06 that were more technical in nature than anything. While I wasn’t exactly seething with bile at the bad animation of 04 like others had, the end result jarred terribly with what the first three episodes had established, and disrupted the tempo that it had been building on.

The unwarranted recap in episode 06 as a result of censorship (the real episode is on the DVD) worsens the pace even further: instead of receiving real story, we’re instead reminded of events just passed; as a result, what would have been non-stop action is essentially broken for the sake of fanservice that didn’t even manage to make it to air. While as of episode 09 the plot and pacing has recovered to its pre-epic state, there’s no telling what might happen next with the addition of Nia, and I’m looking forward to any future developments.

Related Posts by Tags

11 Responses to “What is a magnum opus? The beginning of Gurren-Lagann”
  1. Moogy says:

    I wrote a pretty harsh entry about GL a little while ago. Check it out later once you’re not afraid of spoilers.

  2. TP says:

    For technicalities:

    Episode 4 detached greatly from its predecessing episodes due to a controversy that erupted behind the scenes.

    That said, do your best in reviewing this “magnum opus.” I’ll be waiting at the end of the tunnel, seeing your efforts paid off.

  3. bateszi says:

    I’ve never viewed “magnum opus” (sounds like a great ice-cream) as a subjective term, more like an objective phrase realised through group consensus. Also, isn’t it kind of presumptuous to apply it to an anime studio still actively producing great movies and TV series? May be Gurren Lagann is Gainax’s magnum opus of 2007? The whole meaning of the phrase (especially the part about it being the “chief work”) is lost if you’re going to use it like this.

    Also, I can tell you that the “best anime ever made” is Grave of the Fireflies. I’m being utterly objective when I say that; it’s not a personal favorite at all, but if we can objectively decide on the criteria of what makes something the best, I’m fairly sure that’d come out on top.

  4. Moogy says:

    bateszi: Well, there’s a problem with looking at it objectively, too. Objectivity is simply an agreed-upon subjective opinion, after all. If you go by general popularity and critical response, then Evangelion is certainly the “objective” magnum opus of anime as a whole. If you look only at America, then Cowboy Bebop is. And, though Grave of the Fireflies may be a very good movie in its own right, what about other well-received works such as Spirited Away, which is, I believe, the top-grossing (and highest rated) animated film of all time in Japan. Shouldn’t it, therefore, be the “objective” magnum opus of Japanese animated films?

    Simply put: Objectivity is subjective too.

  5. bateszi says:

    @Moogy: I’m not going purely on popularity, otherwise Dragonball Z and Pokemon would be the unquestioned “magnum opus”‘ of Japanese animation. I just think in terms of objective traits i.e. tangible areas of a production that aren’t inextricably linked with a personal bias combined with the sheer critical acclaim, looking at it in that way, Grave of the Fireflies is the best anime ever. Also, I sometimes think people confuse “favorite” with “best”, if you can separate the two, then it’s fairly easy to work out what is objectively the best in Japanese anime, but that doesn’t mean you or I have to like it.

  6. Xerox says:

    …which was basically posting screencaps of what happened during the episode while employing choice, eloquent, and concise vocabulary consisting entirely of phrases like “THIS WAS EPIC!!!”, “GAR”, and “I CRIED MANLY TEARS”, rather than offering any coherent dissection or discussion.

    You know, I’ve said this so many times, but at the end of it all, I just stopped thinking coherently. GL killed my ability to think faster than a speeding bullet, drugs, alcohol, high blood pressure, heart attack, what have you. It was EPIC, it was GAR, I cried not really manly tears, but TEARS anyway. I mean, GL’s probably one of the best anime experience out there, if you let it. Coherent dissection or discussion, um, sure, why not, when my brain starts functioning again, when I regain the ability to speak and string together thoughts, dissection and discussion might sound like fun.

    As for the magnum opus, refer to the cat proximity, it explains everything. Everything.

  7. Owen S says:

    Moogy: Yeah, I plan to go through my feedreader to read the more spoiler-laded posts at some point. Gotcha.

    TP: Haha, funny you mention that. I was there for the whole thing, but thanks anyway. (: Much appreciate your support.

    bateszi:

    more like an objective phrase realised through group consensus.

    i.e. tangible areas of a production that aren’t inextricably linked with a personal bias combined with the sheer critical acclaim

    Herein lies the problem which I grapple with. Whose objective terms do we use? Which group consensus? International, Anglo-centric, Western, Asian, or Japan? Whose critical aclaim? Professional (ANN) or grassroots (us bloggers)? Couldn’t I say that your usage of those terms, “tangible areas of production”, might lend an unfair advantage to Grave of the Fireflies, thus making it ultimately a magnum opus according to bateszi instead of it truly achieving the sense of the word?

    Unless, of course, you agree to accept that there are limitations to the term given its man-made conceptual origins and settle on a fixed definition for the sake of discussion; “magnum opus” here, in my opinion, is as easily definable as “moe” due to its roots in subjectivity and taste

    Xerox: Yes, m’dear. *patpat* Aren’t you glad I’m watching it now?

  8. nirai kanai » Blog Archive » Feel the rainbow, taste the rainbow says:

    [...] competition, but I just couldn’t help myself. I’ve been waiting, literally, ages for Owen to post on Gurren Lagann and he finally did. I’ve also been looking for an excuse to write about GL, here’s my juicy opportunity [...]

  9. IKnight says:

    Like a hungry fish, you can rely on me to take bait.

    Anyhow, yes GL is good. I personally think that writing about it is unlike writing about other shows. Where most other series work to conceal their skeleton and structure, GL shoves it in front of your face.

  10. bateszi says:

    @Owen: There is no such thing as an “objective” review. Everything is subjective, but my opinion is that it’s easy to find what’s an objectively good piece of art by slicing a cross section of opinion from the various areas of fandom. For example, if a movie has over 1000 votes on IMDB and a rating of over 7.9, I’m willing to accept that it’s an objectively good film, regardless of whether or not I enjoy it myself (my tastes often fall in line with popular opinion anyway).

    As for the whole magnum opus thing, as Xerox points out on her blog, it’s all about semantics so I’d rather not waste any more time if we’re clearly applying different definitions. My general feeling is that it’s not really an individual’s place to claim whether or not something is a “magnum opus”, I prefer to let time decide.

  11. Martin says:

    Scuse the late reply - I actually had to look up what magnum opus meant (and I studied latin for four years…*hangs head in shame*).

    I think Bateszi has a point in it being too early to give GL this title - give it five years or so, and I’d be able to say if Owen’s right. What I will say is that GL (or at least the first arc, which is all I was able to see) is the quintissential Gainax production - it has everything that makes their better titles great. Over-the-top sci-fi, genuine emotion, fan service delivered with a knowing wink…all on an epic scale. Right now I’d say Gunbuster or FLCL are the magnum opus (opi?) for Gainax right now. That said, GL has always felt to me like Gunbuster with added ‘Huerrgh!’ so yeah, time will tell. I definitely wouldn’t be surprised if GL is uttered in the same breath as those two shows by fans, even years down the line.

Leave a Reply

Note: This post is over 8 months old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.