Kure-nai 03: I thought what I’d do was, I’d smile like I was one of those liars
This episode proved to be an outstanding one, with exceptional expositional dialogue that made me grin triumphantly when I realised where everything was headed halfway through; it was one of those Eureka, feel-good moments that you can’t help but pat your back for. It’s a niche, to be sure — different people will value different things, but what I value the most above all is good writing. Show, not tell. Never spoonfeed the viewer. Don’t assume that your audience is mostly dense (even if they are), because there will always be those who will get what you’re trying to say, even if you’re not saying it through normal means.

character designs like this would have robbed the show of its seriousness
Naturally, I was one of those who got it. For it starts the moment the episode begins; the writing is so finely honed that the opening scene foreshadows what will take place in the rest of the episode, with not a single minute wasted. We begin with Tamaki and Murasaki watching a TV drama of some sort, and the very first line that Tamaki says, “These kinds of women do it knowing that they’re being deceived”, is rather apt, as is the episode title, “The Fraud’s Face”.
Which fraud’s being referred to in the title? Shinkurou, of course. Which women are Tamaki referring to? It would have to be the women in Shinkurou’s life, as Murasaki proceeds to reply, “Even though they know it?” The dialogue here is significant for immediately confirms what we’ve already known in the past two episodes, even if it’s not articulated: Shinkurou leads a double life. A good director never wastes a single scene, and the way in which a simple conversation like this proceeds to flesh out the 20 minutes is amazing.
Tamaki’s words are illuminating yet ironic; when she says “They’re thinking, “I’ve got to be with this person,” and “If I’m patient enough…”, she isn’t just talking about Shinkurou’s lovelife, even if it applies to them first and foremost; it also refers to Murasaki’s late mother, who was, like Ginko and Yuuno, in a relationship that involved closing one eye, and hoping everything would work out through the deception. It’s ironic, for as Murasaki’s probing and innocent questions slowly reveal, her attitude towards relationships isn’t any different from her meta-fictional counterpart.

I’m trying not to make a Real Doll joke here
Consider these two lines: “But you know, you just kind of want to treat them well.” (in reference to how she feels such women should be treated) and “I’m looking for a man who’ll treat me well.” (in reference to how she wants to be treated in a relationship) hint at the cyclical nature of such farcical relationships — all that the man can do in his subterfuge is treat the woman well, and all the woman wants in that situation is to be treated well; a relationship of convenience, in other words. This is further confirmed when Murasaki asks, “Are there even men like that?” and gets the reply “There’s one who’s surprisingly close.” from Tamaki, before the scene cuts to Shinkuro at school.
This concept is re-iterated many other times during the episode, and Tamaki’s role here is significant in how she articulates the subtext, making it clear by means of hints that Shinkurou is that “convenient man” that she wishes she could have; aside from that, she also justifies Yuuno and Ginko’s roles in Shinkurou’s life, giving them depth and character by stating the premise on which they stand before their respective scenes.
Yuuno is one such person that suffers for this — despite apparently being in a relationship of sorts with Shinkurou to the extent of making lunch for him daily, she doesn’t know all of him. He won’t tell her what he does at work as she’s previously noted, giving lame excuses like how he doesn’t want to bore her with the details; he even lies to her as to the nature of his current job, in an amusing parallel with that of the proverbial cheating spouse.

maybe it’s just me, but I think she’d be a lot more pleased if he spent less time on the phone
Ginko gets the short end of the stick, too; we see her using her job as Shinkuro’s informant as a mere ploy for her to get closer to Shinkurou, forcing him to divert his attention away from Yuuno in a calculated phone call. It’s here that it’s revealed that they’re childhood friends — not in that puerile way that usually involves childhood promises (even if there is one), but in a perfectly natural manner that lets us know more than she does herself; be it a romantic love or just a fond attachment, she resents how she doesn’t play that important a role in his life anymore, and resents him for it.
The significance of the kindergarten here is in its duality. Aside from being a suitable assignment, it also reveals to us the nature of Ginko and Shinkurou and their relationship; while Shinkurou’s all but forgotten about his promise to Ginko and how he was going to take over the ramen shop with her, we can see that Ginko hasn’t, and still holds on to that, refusing to budge from the past. When he says “It’s not something that can stay around forever” and she replies with “So, you’ve become a person who can say even that.”, Ginko is expressing her disbelief at what he’s become, a revelation further underscored by Shinkurou’s nonchalant “Depends on the person, I guess.” that implies that he’s not the same guy that she used to know.
Whether intentional or not, the scene in the laboratory with Murasaki and the anatomy figure seemed overtly allegorical to me in how it mirrors Shinkurou and his condition (again, the theme of different sides come into play here) and how she naturally feels that it’s in pain, just as Shinkurou’s dark past and nightmares have hurt him. It’s telling that in the scene before this Ginko says “Are there people who would think that you’re strong after looking at you?” before it cuts to Murasaki asking the figure if it’s alright, since it looks like it’s suffering.

ditto this one, too
What’s even more obvious is that the conversation between Murasaki and Shinkurou that follows once again tells us what the characters themselves cannot: Shinkurou himself cannot identify what Murasaki is trying to describe, in an allegorical representation of how he’s blind to the extent of the burden he carries, and how by trying to show different sides of himself to the different people in his life he’s changed so much that he doesn’t even realise who or what he’s become.
Since practically everyone else has written about the infamous three-way dialogue to death, I’ll skip that part and save you what you already know. What follows later is more significant, though — it brings the exchange at the beginning of the episode full circle and reconciles Shinkurou’s predicament with Murasaki’s past, in addition to informing us about how everything that happens in the episode ultimately relates to the both of them in a cohesive manner; Shinkurou with his raison d’etre, and Murasaki with her keen perception.

who you gonna call? SOMEWHAT RELIABLE!
The first question would be Why does Shinkurou look after her? By not wanting to show his other side to her in the way he refused to use his fighting skills on the train, he protected her both physically and emotionally; aside from how he’s obviously kept her out of harm’s way, he’s also protected her from the side he doesn’t want her to look at, the dark and violent side that manifests at night when he goes out on a job. In other words, protecting her innocence. He’s the “real martial artist” that Yuuno talks about; the judo members are but sportsmen compared to him.
The second question is Why does Murasaki say what she does? It’s not a question of being over the top, as some quarters have accused her character of — rather, it’s a result of her not wanting Shinkurou to walk down the same path of self-deception that her mother did, and her outburst is a plea of concern about his wellbeing. Even children will know a lie when they see it, and Murasaki’s precociousness isn’t the result of the author being fantastic — it’s a result of her character being realistic.

Shinji would have been reduced to tears
It’s only been the third episode and I’m already blown away. Is there anyone out there at all not watching this for some reason? If you like intelligent anime that doesn’t dumb down for its viewers, you owe it to yourself to watch this gem, and if you happen to disagree with everything else the show stands for, then watch it only for the dialogue. It’s that great.


“Murasaki’s precociousness isn’t the result of the author being fantastic — it’s a result of her character being realistic.”
Aren’t those two directly related?
Someone needs to watch ep 4. Lol. Usagijen was saying how she was glad Shinkurou’s past was not all dumped out in a 8 page long flashback. I guess she spoke too soon lol.
Otherwise, interesting post, but not as interesting as my list on how to use dakimakuras. Also, I think you’re reading too much into certain specific events, such as the anatomy figure.
We need Shinkurou to start killing some yakuza.
I do like the fact that the anime adaptation is taking a different approach from what I heard that was in the novel. I have been hooked since the first episode too and can’t wait to see how Shin is gonna explain what he does at night to Murasaki. I just hope Shin can get things together as well with all the womanly pressure going around him causing him trouble. For episode 3, what I like the most was the fact that Murasaki thinks the whole school is Shin’s and that he has to do all of this “training” and “studying” to be a good servant. :P
I’m supposed to be heading out of town for the weekend this evening so I’ll post a proper comment when I’ve got back home and given this more than a quick skim-through. For now I will say this though: the scene on the train and the conversation afterwards was superb. It proves that Kurenai is a character-driven rather than an action-driven show but is probably more effective that way.
Well observed. This explains Murasaki’s maturity and her behaviour perfectly. She’s deeply observant and has such a strong sense of justice, yet her immaturity means she communicates them in unreserved, tactless ways. I suppose that’s what the train scene, in part (the other being the Shin character study you’ve discussed), was meant to demonstrate. Although, I was completely on her side during that scene and I love her brutal honesty . The sophistication of the writing means that every one of their conflicts makes you question your own sense of morality/ethic and how you practice them. I think a lot more of the series will revolve around these kind of incidents and gradually the pair will influence one another in deep/meaningful ways. Tis the sign of genuinely successful character-driven drama, after all.
As for Yuuno . . . am I the only one deeply suspicious of her? Granted, her awareness of Murasaki’s family name could just be common knowledge within the world of the show, but she makes me feel uneasy – she seems calculated and it gets my spidey-sense going. She isn’t just your typical ‘nice girl loves the protagonist’ character (like Himawari of xxxHolic for instance) . . . I dunno, maybe I’m over-hypothesising, but I wouldn’t be surprised if she becomes the centre of a dramatic twist at some point.
lk:
No, not in the sense that I meant. What I’m referring to here by “fantastic” is the accusation that Murasaki is precocious for precociousness’s sake (i.e. behaving out of her age range for no particular reason other than a character trait), which is a statement I don’t buy at all. Rather, she’s precocious because of how intricate a character she is, hence my calling her “realistic”.
tj: Yeah yeah, you watch China subs, I don’t. Hopefully BSS will be done today or tomorrow. Also, considering Kou Matsuo directed, did series composition, script and storyboard for the first three episodes, I’m not writing the anatomy figure off as easily as that.
Hige: Thanks. The hard-hitting dialogue certainly caught me off-guard — I was amazed at the way I first supported Murasaki, then Shinkurou when I realised what he was trying to do, even if it pained me to watch it happen. A one-two punch of realisation, if you could call it that. I’ve never had an anime make me feel so wretched and despairing in so long, I’ve almost forgotten what it felt like.
There’s definitely some foreshadowing in the part where Yuuno seems shocked that a Kuhouin doesn’t recognise her last time, so I guess you’re right in that sense. It might turn out to be a red herring, considering her grandfather (or was it father) taught Shinkurou martial arts, so I wouldn’t put that much weight on it for the time being. But it’s things like these that make me love this show.
Fun fact: According to a reliable source that’s read the novel, almost all of this episode was anime-original. I am going to pay close attention to Matsuo’s work from now on. ^_^
Now you’ve convinced me to pick up this series….hope it’ll be as good for me too. :)
wow, I never thought about the conversation between Murasaki and Tamaki that way, until you mentioned it. Great observations.
Will it be spoiling if I say that what Hige’s thinking is right? The ‘other side’ that Yuuno has is indeed hinted in this episode, and I find it surprising that in the novel, Murasaki supposedly recognized her as a ‘Houzuki’ and became apprehensive… well I have full faith in the anime so I wouldn’t worry about anything =) Just prepare yourself for more of Yuuno to come!
and to tj, you laughed too soon as well, because the way the anime presented the flashback was just fabulous! so much unlike the sloppy one-time one-sided revelation of the novel :p
Yay, you have good observations and usually I just watch my anime, probably not understanding half of it but just going “what the heck,” anyway, lols. I didn’t realize that Tamaki and Murasaki’s conversation meant much either, rather, I just thought it was cute.
MURASAKI ftw! This episode was filled with lots of cute Murasaki times. Episode 4 gets really interesting :D
murasaki = precious character
After a bit of reflection, I’m seeing a superficial similarity between this and Luc Besson’s Leon (for you heathens: starring Jean Reno, Gary Oldman and Nathalie Portman in her pre-Star Wars days…y’know, when she could still act). The youngster gives an alternative viewpoint to the morality of what her protector is doing, also providing tonnes of potential in terms of character development for both of them. It’s a given that Murasaki will learn some important lessons during the series’ course but the simplicity of a child’s point of view – not cluttered with ambiguities, doublethink and borderline hypocrisy that comes with thinking like an adult – can teach Shinkurou a lot too. As the old saying goes, “Here’s to the child, and all he has to teach us.”
Getting back to the train scene for instance, it’s ‘obvious’ that Murasaki was speaking out of turn but that’s judging her by the standards of adult society – their contrasting personalities and situations offer alternative views and encourage the viewer to reconsider what is actually ‘acceptable’ because ‘adults are always right’ is drummed into most of us from an early age. From the POV of the series itself, a younger character can be more outspoken so slip out opinions that older characters cannot get away with (e.g. Lisa in the Simpsons, who has stronger morals than most of the adult characters in the show) – it’s something that I hope the series doesn’t forget when in ‘social commentary’ mode. At any rate, while I’ll keep watching for sure I think I’ll have a hard time blogging this one since anything I want to say at length has been said (better) half a dozen times already.
Excellent points, Martin. How dare you say you’re going to have a hard time?! I’d love to see that line of thought of yours fleshed out into a post, if only because I can see where you’re going with this. Yes, I’ve seen Leon (what little I can remember of it), and it’s an apt comparison, if any.
Also, I wouldn’t say it’s possible to actually exhaust all discussion on a show with such depth, since you’ve just proved yourself wrong by making me look at Kure-nai that much differently. That’s an interesting take, and I’d love to see you take that idea of yours and put it into a post.
(emphasis mine)
This part distracted me from really being able to absorb the rest of the entry (despite reading it numerous times) because I feel you interpreted it completely incorrectly. I don’t know Japanese so I cannot support my interpretation with anything other than instinct and common sense, but it seems to me that what Tamaki was saying was that, as a female, when you like a guy you end up being fooled because you wish to treat THEM well. I’m not sure if it was semantics or the fact that you’re a guy that this went over your head, but after posing the question to two other friends of mine (both male) who have watched the show, it seems it likely just an issue of semantics. The reason Tamaki’s distinction (wanting to BE treated well) is so important is because it’s against the norm — it’s also what makes Shinkurou special. He ends up lying to his women out of a desire to treat them well. It’s ironic because that desire of his, which should be positive, is starting out to be as deceptive as a typical male of the type Tamaki and Murasaki are watching on TV, but not only towards the girls, but as you mention later on in your entry, but also for himself. Scenes such as his explanation of his childhood to Murasaki in episode 4 are signs that he’s starting to understand the importance of honesty in regard to treating someone well, in my opinion. I expected him to lie, but he didn’t, which I think was a significant change from his usual behavior (he lied about nightmares in the first episode). At least somewhat, he’s stopped using deception to protect.