And now for something completely different. I’m convinced that I’m going to wake up one day and find that my eternal nemesis self-proclaimed rival fellow blogger bateszi has been one step ahead of my life all this time, pulling the strings of my internet existence like a puppeteer’s wont to do. A month ago when he linked the Slow Blogging manifesto (mirror) on Twitter [1] [2] my first reaction wasn’t that of interest, but that of recognition. Something clicked in my head, like a Magic Circuit turning on.

It's the Zodiac Year of... well, the better you know.
It’s a particularly satisfying moment whenever you discover someone putting words or a structure to behaviour or thoughts of yours previously unexplained–a response I suppose has roots in those fabled days of yore where the proverbial caveman attempted to explain lightning by way of gods. I’ve previously gone into the How of ‘raw watching’, and I believe I owe everyone a Why to back that up. So here’s why.
Remember this post? If you were around the ’sphere in any capacity, of course you did. Bloggers were in paroxysms over something that they didn’t want to hear, let alone understand. People were defensive. People were dumb. People relied on the good old motto of “It’s the internet, I can do what I want!” without really lending much by way of dialogue–well, maybe a few did, but hey, controversy. How dare you criticise our hegemony! Or for that matter, how dare you even think of criticism? You stay in your side of the ’sphere and I’ll stay in my side, okay? Agree to disagree, blah blah blah, and nothing of value was lost.
This is a belated (almost a year!) answer to that.
Essentially, ‘Raw watching’ is nothing more than fuel to an episodic blog that feeds the concept of Providing A Service. Stripped down and deconstructed, an episodic blog at its most fundamental can offer no more opinion than an editorial blog can offer a consistent posting schedule, if we’re going to go with that traditional division of blogs. If you want to be old-school media about it, episodic blogs are like the cub reporters reporting about current events, and editorial blogs the snarky writers with their op-ed pieces.
How does this relate to raw watching? It’s simple–raw watching, and episodic blogging by extension, is nothing more than a report of what happened in an episode. You want to report the same news as everyone out there? That’s all well and good, but we’re sharing the same newspaper! That, I think, is what bateszi wanted to say, albeit in less analogous and more direct terms. And people get angry when you don’t use analogies, it’s like having the chair pulled away from under them as they’re about to sit down for dinner.
Editorial blogs, on the other hand, are essentially built on the concept of Providing An Opinion, and report on what they think about what happened. This isn’t me going “hurr durr, episodic blogs aren’t deep”–they just can’t in the same way that fish can’t survive on land when birds can. Do you blame birds for not being able to hunt underwater? Occasionally you’ll get the odd breed that can do just that, I’m sure, but it’s a rare case for the most part, even if they’re multiplying as of late.
That was my rage against the machine, an invention wrought by the twin demons of Supply and Demand. That there are fans out there who want to spoil themselves silly about the latest episode is one thing. To feed that monster with multifarious maws when it has plenty to dine on is another, and I believe that my scorn had its roots there. Are there reporters who make up stories or creatively embellish facts just to beat their rivals to the scoop? Probably. Doesn’t mean we’ve got to do the same, though.
I can’t bear to look at my archives in the same way that some people are loath to admit that they’re the sibling of a particular person, because some of them (the posts, not the people) are like the raw watching equivalent of editorials. They aren’t much by way of what I pride myself on doing, were meant to fill a time/space requirement (I wanted to say something at that point in time), and are embarrassing to read. Yes, Cruel Angel Theses is a team blog, I just happen to share the same name with that guy who posted here long ago.
Despite the glaring disparity in our taste and experience, I’ve always found Paul to be a good read. Why’s that? You can see the care he puts into each post, the almost hysterical amount of preparation contained in each word, so much so that it feels like I’m reading something meant to be performed on stage, not read through a feedreader. It’s the kindred spirit thing that two strangers can connect over with just a glance, and then some.
In comparison, what episodic blogging as of late has given me, well… nothing more than a heightened sense of elitist disdain and justified superiority over the hoi polloi of blogging. Admit it, how many of you were predicting the responses to Toradora (”Tsunderes are the cancer that is killing anime!132ninetyeight”) or Kannagi (”How dare they pander to otaku! How dare they!”)? I know I did. Speed does not equal precision, unlike what you’ve seen of battles portrayed in fiction.

If too much of a good thing is bad, what does that make too much of a dumb thing?
But blogging isn’t a battle, and shouldn’t be. Neither is this about me being a green-eyed monster, so think again–for those of you imbeciles about to accuse me of being bitter about not being able to post at the rate of those who outstrip me, amounts of incoming traffic, or any such delusions of grandeur that I’m apparently aspiring to, well, have a pre-emptive, idiots. It’s called the Blue Ocean Strategy, and it’s something the internet was made for. Not like you’d know how to use it to begin with.
Which brings me to my second point: In a framework of non-episodic blogging, Slow Anime Blogging makes Long Anime Posts; alternately, Short Anime Posts are made from Fast Anime Blogging. This is where you should feel free to disagree with me by all means (for matters of brevity and sanity, agreeing with the first half of my post is a must), for here’s where I’m going to throw down the gauntlet.
If you’re the author of a non-episodic fast blog–and I’m using ‘non-episodic’ here simply because there are blogs out there that don’t blog episodically but don’t quite fit into an traditional editorial blog’s skin, either–there’s a chance that you write short posts. You write them often. There’s the possibility that you don’t put a lot of thought into it. And your content will (not necessarily, but for some, with surprising regularity) be less meaningful and more homogeneous than that of a non-episodic slow blog.
Again, before you arm yourself to the teeth with nouns and verbs, I suggest you step back from your little caffeine-fuelled, sleep-deprived, 21st-century Life of the Now and chew on that for a bit. What do slow bloggers usually do? They make up for it in word count what they can’t in post count. Occasionally there’s your odd hero who effortlessly posts across blogs like he’s a bee and blogs flowers, but we can’t all be like that. I’m glad we can’t, too, since the possibility is a frightening thought.
Unlike bateszi, my primary annoyance isn’t with episodic blogs. I’m past that, we fill different niches, and I don’t really read them anymore no thanks to my ever-growing blogroll, which is expanding like the waistline of a glutton at a buffet. My habits of consumption have altered as of late, and I just can’t be arsed to be the sole voice of reason in a raucous, superficial crowd, or be bothered to point out time and again that premise is not the same as genre (thanks, Aroduc).
My primary annoyance is with non-episodic blogs that blog quickly, and sparsely as a result. They can be shallow. They only ever bother to skim the surface. In their ever-so-hasty bid to go all-out against episodic blogs in a war that shouldn’t have been fought in the first place, they’ve become a fake GN drive that emits red particles–something that should be able to run forever, but as a result of technical imperfection, have to refuel ever so often. In other words, they’re doing it wrong.
The question here is, “Why so hasty?” It’s also the reason I removed my limiter for a moment and gave otou-san both barrels–because his first attempt was terrible. In that single post (and I’m not trying to take you down a peg for that, I’m just stating why I replied the way I did then), he demonstrated no more depth of opinion than your average anonymous imageboard. Considering that Google already lists what happens to be an excellent precedent for this, you’d think he’d have gotten it right the first time.
If you have a non-episodic blog, word quantity is post quality. It’s that simple. No two ways about it. I don’t get why non-episodic bloggers want to dance to the same monotonous tune as the episodic bloggers, since they’re showing off their moves to a different audience. I’m not tarring everyone with the same brush, but you’ll be hard pressed to find someone who blogs irregularly with a decent word count per post whose writing sucks. Consider the inverse for a moment, though, and you’ll see what I mean.
Of course, there’s the other argument that can be used against this, which is the laughable “Anime blogging shouldn’t be serious business!” Really? Pray tell, why are you then taking the time to find hosting, setting aside invaluable time in your 24 hours that could be used to do something else, and watching a show for the purpose of reproducing what you thought of an episode or ten on the internet in all its glory? Don’t you think that that amount of effort is already serious enough? Or are you going to pull out one of those memetic discussion-killers like ‘tl;dr’ and pass?

It's not like ZUN intentionally created a monopoly or anything.
I’m tired, oh yes. I’m tired of seeing so much wasted potential that I have to italicise the phrase to get anywhere near how tired I am of reading non-episodic bloggers that I know could write better. You’re not one of the *chans, guys, there’s no reason for you to write as if you need to ward off the dreaded sage, or eventual post limit. There’s no reason for you to go head-to-head with another form of blogging that laughs at your pitiful attempts at regular opinion when they’ve been doing the same for ages, and better. There’s no reason to not write with reason.
Different people have different methods of recuperating. Martin made another blog. So did Paul. Me, I just took time off to play Fate/stay night, and that worked out exceedingly well for me. I think my knife’s pretty sharp now, thank you. The benefits that come with blogging about something not bound to time like anime is immense, and considering that I finished Heaven’s Feel and blogged about it quite some time after the release of the patch, well, go figure.
My hunch behind this dichotomy of People Who Take Their Time To Think and People Who Don’t Have Time To Think is this, that the internet can be divided into two kinds of people:
- Those who regard the internet as freedom of expression.
- Those who regard the internet as freedom of exchanging expression.
I like to think that those who subscribe to #1 are in a time-bubble of sorts where Web 2.0 never happened, since they’re content with merely telling the world what they think, as opposed to why they think about what they think. How is this done? Words, or a lack of it. The less you say, the less meaningful it becomes to more people, and the inverse is true–the more you say, the more meaningful it becomes to more people since it goes from something that’s solely relevant to yourself to something that everyone can relate to.
(I don’t think I need to mention that those who reply in length to this post will inevitably prove my point.)
Have fun with your non-episodic blog by all means. Watch some anime. Read some manga. Play Fate/stay night a visual novel or two, and dammit, do it quickly since it’s rather lonely at the top. But most of all, and most importantly, don’t forget to be verbose. In fact, don’t be afraid to go on for more than a pitiful paragraph or two if you’re going to tell me why something rocks, sucks, or is in-between. For while it might mean everything to you, it means nothing to me, and if your writing can mean so little to those who read it, then why are you doing it at all to begin with? Not because you like the sound of your own voice, I’m sure.
2009 is going to be 2008, Extended Version for me, because I’m going to take my time savouring shows that are meant to be enjoyed at their own pace, not some absurd, socially-enforced once-a-week duration. In other words, when I don’t feel pressured into watching it. You’re watching anime for the company, you say? What a farce. Anime is timeless, and no matter when you watch it, how you watch it, or where you watch it, there’s always bound to be someone as slow, if not slower than you.
So don’t forget to take it easy. Kick speed to the kerb. Happy New Year, everyone.


If you want to convey the arrogant erudition of οἱ ὀλίγοι, don’t put the definite article in front of οἱ πολλοί . Adding an English article suggests a rebellious attitude towards the classically-educated aristocrat.
…you lost me. Is that Greek?
From your eleventh (?) paragraph, yes.
Still doesn’t ring a bell. I assure you that any resemblance the paragraph (whichever one it is) had to a reference of something as obscure as that was wholly coincidental. Allusions to Grecian literature were never my thing.Wait, nevermind, I finally got it. It’s way too early in the morning for this. What’s more, I used it in a Contemporary English way, dammit! S-s-silly Classic scholar! It’s not like I’m trying to sneak in an obscure reference or anything!
…
While I am broadly of the same orientation on the episodic/editorial deal…
I always thought post quality bore some relationship to focus of argument + quality of writing. The imperative I most gleefully ignore (except when under Riex’s command) is “murder your darlings”. I leave ideas/phrases in even when intelligent editing would make a better post. I think that’s the ultimate nemesis of editorial blogs.
And I quite like enforced schedules. Not for community, for its effect in managing the experience.
“If you have a non-episodic blog, word quantity is post quality.”
Is that supposed to an indirect statement that your posts are all exceedingly high quality?
Although I’ve been known to write a long-winded rant or two, I’m more fond of the “Brevity is the soul of wit” school of thought. Well, if nothing else I have to give you credit for using the phrase “multifarious maws” in a legitimate sentence, I suppose.
οἱ πολλοί
or perhaps オイ!ハヤク
or even better…負い!葉y抱く
>> Don’t you think that that amount of effort is already serious enough?
Dude, no. You can’t be serious.
I like how you’ve laid a trap here by writing something that’s too long to read but by its very nature assaults people who think that brevity is a virtue. Which it is. Well played, even if I fundamentally disagree. And generally I can’t be assed to actually read your blog, no offense (I actually mean that), it really is too long for my taste much of the time.
Where would someone even begin to try to negate fallacies like that? I admit, I often lack the anime-blogospheric knowledge to tell when you’re being completely serious, but that just doesn’t resemble the kind of opinion that reasonable people could actually have.
You’ve oversimplified the world of anime blogging into two camps, whereas all some of us genuinely want to do is write a blog about anime. Painting the people who don’t want to fall neatly into your two boxes as people who don’t “get it,” or don’t think things through properly, is absolutist and ridiculous.
As for me, and the post in question… I wrote that while on the road on a trip for work, when I really didn’t have time to write anything — but I enjoy blogging, I had a thought, and I put it out there, a couple people even laughed. Big deal. Three points to be made: 1. Sometimes it’s liberating, fun, and fantastic to toss something off. It keeps your head from crawling too far up your own ass. 2. There just isn’t always enough time to write something like the followup, which incidentally is something I sometimes regret doing but for the fact that I enjoyed writing it too. There are those of us with jobs, school, families, etc., not to mention anime to watch. 3. The fact that people share your opinion is a reason to not express it? Whut? Bonus 4th point: A large chunk of anime is none too deep.
So, to tie all that together: If you think “non-thinking” bloggers are mucking up your little word-party, then don’t dump them into the same category as yourself. Both problems solved, let’s all get drunk, etc.
A quick, general reply before the nitpicking gets out of hand, and then I’m off to bed:
When I said this,
I meant that in the sense that there are way too many posts (c.f. 12 Days of, 2008) out there that go about things by way of “I liked it. The end.” What the hell? I mean, this isn’t a 1st grade essay you’re writing, it’s a blog. Written by someone who’s sufficiently coherent enough to articulate said feelings more than just “I like X” or “I hate Y” because he or she isn’t 7-years-old. Note that I didn’t specify the degree of quantity, just that it must have some quantity. We’re talking about our ’sphere here, people, do I have to start linking to specific posts and make myself the new
Angra ManyuAuthor of 2009?I do understand and appreciate the point about brevity, but if you’re going to go in-depth into anime of any sort at any point, quantity is inevitable. There are too many e/n posts out there for my liking, and if they want to do what they want to do, then hey, by all means. I’m just proposing a more obvious alternative.
I hope the rest of the comments from this point onward actually focus on other things, since that isn’t all I brought up. But it’s not like I didn’t see this coming. Also, ‘brevity’ is not an excuse, as I’ve said, for posts that are no different from an average troll post/thread on /a/ or /jp/. I don’t know about you guys, but I’m proud to be a blogger, to the extent of actually taking pride in making sure people understand my point of view.
well, this time with brevity: I support that you’re encouraging people to push themselves to stronger blog posts, of course that’s gerat. But not every blog/blogger/post is measured with the same metrics, standards, and aesthetics.
Yes pacing is good. I have ambitions for the kinds of posts I want to do, so I’ll definitely a blogger of the slower kind. And I mostly write about older shows anyway, so I’m rarely ever trendy.
To say something about otou-san and how I understand his aesthetic. The game for him, and perhaps some others is to make the point as concise as possible for the purposes of readability for the person who’d rather skim than read. Understandably, there are trade-offs. His posts won’t gratify me as much as the tl;dr fare that I regularly gorge myself on and indulge myself in writing.
Is brilliance possible in so few words. I’d say yes, despite my preference for verbosity. It’s a matter whether he, or others committed to this style achieve their objectives. I’d rather evaluate them that way.
And yes, the blue ocean strategy. I use it as well, fits in my long-tail economic viewpoint too.
What about these people? D:
For some reason, the general gist I get from this post is “TRY HARDER”. Or rather, “TRY LONGER”. I just say, “Whatever works for you”. :P
For what it’s worth (and I’ll try to be brief), I think the main problem with all of this is that not all anime bloggers want to write for the world to understand. Some write for themselves, some write for themselves and hope that others read them, and some write for the sake of articulating their opinions as clearly as possible, which usually results in a massive word count. I’m sure there are other kinds of anibloggers out there as well. My point is, I guess, that not everyone would care to write a specific style, i.e. the style that involving write a couple thousand words on the symbolism in ef or the psychology in Evangelion; some people would be more satisfied with a few witty comments and a single well-written paragraph pointing out something overlooked in a show that everyone’s watching. Likewise, I’m sure we have different kinds of readers as well, some of which would learn more from a quick almost point-form post and others which would learn from all of the tl;dr stuff. I consider myself to be part of the latter, and I at least try to read as much as I can, but no doubt there are others that would rather engage in something more resembling a discussion rather than an essay.
As for which of the two is more effective at conveying a thought or opinion, that’s anyone’s guess.
tl;dr
blogging is fun
Very succinct observation. The rest is just too long (and I am too lazy to read). I can probably understand that it’s rather impossible to control word count when you are trying to elaborate on something sophisticated. Sometimes, words are just not enough simply because there are so many ideas trying to jaunt out into the open of the blogging world. However, that is perhaps why many writers, those of the top caliber, manage to communicate to their audience using the least words possible.
I do not disagree that many episodic blogs are now just going through the motion of what actually happened in a series. Sure, if you are to judge episodic blogs based on whether they are able to delve deep into the notion of Freud’s id and ego disparity in Kurokami, you are looking at the wrong place. However, most episode summary blogs do not even give you any food for thought. A simple question to ask why a certain character did this, and how it relates to reality. A simple question to question whether a moral decision by a character is right. I think that it is hardly done even in the context of episodic summaries. That is why you have such a negative conception of episodic summary blogs.
Of course, it is quite obvious that you do not aim to pander to a demographic that will probably go into total confusion whenever you use big words. I am more agreeable to otou-san that brevity is quality, simply because I am targeting a group of people looking for “news” without trying to sound overly deep and big. Words can be used to explain, but it can also be used to intimidate and confuse. That happens even if you do not intend to. I am only there to give them the news, and give them some food for thought. I ain’t there to give them an elaborate answer. That’s your job.
Well, you know, I’ve begun tiring of episodic blogging myself. I always kept promising myself I’d try to do each and every individual episode of something I committed to, but I end up never doing it; and recently I think I’ve learned that I do much better when I talk about bigger issues that cover multiple episodes. On the other hand, I don’t really do editorials much, and can’t usually think of topics for them all that often. So I guess I’ll be trying to do something in between in the coming year.
As for long posts=quality….well, you are looking at a naturally verbose person here. But one who’s also trying to be more concise and straight to the point. Or at least kind enough to break up long posts into multiple parts these days. :)
What people think – that’s reality. Why people think what they think – that’s speculation at best and utter nonsense at worst. Opinions come from the gut, not the mind. If you pressure authors to fish around for post hoc justifications for all their opinions, most of them will end up publishing incoherent crap like otou-san in his second Clannad Sucks post.
I judge posts by their entertainment value. It’s often directly proportional to the amount of time, effort, and thought put into them, but not always.
@BK “entertainment value” is relative in itself anyway.
Like ETERNAL said, some folk write mostly for themselves (even if they don’t know it). Also, i’ve seen blogs which are totally meant for a person’s close circle of friends to read, so they tend to write short posts like: “ok, here’s my opinion” and then probably meet and discuss it over coffee. I don’t see there’s a definition for what a blog should be, except to log in what you want to log.
Sort of to tack on the thoughts here in the comments:
1. Brevity is a virtue, no matter what you write. It’s good to aim for it.
2. It’s much more frustrating when you read a post like this and walk away with nothing much to talk about. I mean, all most of us done in the comments is to criticize a few points made in the post because they are unsubstantiated and wrong. I don’t think that’s a great way to discuss anything.
3. Often times I’d go read posts that are long because it’s on a topic I like, only to find a fairly simple A-B-C essay about things I read about years ago. Especially on anime reviews of older shows. Talking about concepts in anime is difficult unless you’ve amassed a lot of experience in dealing with concepts or dealing with anime, so that’s expected, but nonetheless irritating.
4. Blogging is an end as well as a means, but others covered this already.
I wonder what our venerable lolikitsune would say regarding all this? ^^
Just throwing in my 2 cents here since everyone else has said what i wanted to say:
You’ve forgotten the lucky people who can actually understand Nihongo unlike us Eigo Neanderthals.
Also, i see where you’re coming from in the word count concept, but the art of blogging succinctly does not just mean MOAR MOAR MOAR. I think Kabitzin does an excellent job of marrying episodic+editorial on Sea Slugs! in his own briefly snarky way, but that’s besides the point. In junior college (i’m a purely Humanities student), the rule of thumb is no less than 2 pages, but verbal diarrhoea spanning 7 pages ain’t necessarily gonna give you an A grade. What i think you tried to say (but didn’t effectively put across) is write enough to make your point, but short enough for readers to digest and generate their own opinions.
@revolemina:
Yeah, okay, thanks for the attempt at fanfiction. I know what I said, thank you very much, and it definitely wasn’t that.
Anyway, before I go any further. I think that this barking up the Brevity tree is getting pretty tiring–thanks, Captain Obvious, I definitely didn’t know about it being good! No.
It appears that some of you are again, missing the point. Brevity can only be achieved if there’s a lot of something that needs to be said to begin with, and insubstantial posts definitely aren’t a show of that, no. I’m talking about getting people to write down their thoughts in greater detail, and you want them to write down their thoughts in greater detail but with less words? Give me a break. Some of you need to do more than comment in your hilariously ignorant way about what you think about the subject without really reading the comments or the post properly, because I’d rather not be talked at. Conversation is a two-way thing, people. My lexical choice is also a pretty stupid point to challenge at this point.
@Baka-Raptor: Your argument is so dumb I cannot even begin to describe where it goes wrong. Oh wait, I can.
How about starting with the part where you claim to know a person’s thoughts? Do you have a PhD in Mind Reading, or are you just pleased to see me? Saying “I liked X” and leaving it at that does nothing for most of us–we all liked X too, big deal. How on earth can I relate to it in any way unless someone tells me why? For that matter, how are you so utterly convinced that a person’s justification for his or her thoughts are “speculation at best and utter nonsense at worst”? Are you Mao or something?
No, you’re not. And you’re using otou-san’s first post and its perceived value as a basis for your argument, not your imaginary psychic powers. That post was *chan-quality shit; the second post was of a more acceptable standard, even if I didn’t agree with its content. But hey, if you find value in shit posts… 10/10 for your attempt though. I was sufficiently entertained.
On a lighter note, here’s something I want to bring up that isn’t about that damned ‘B’ word!
@N: It’s simple, really. There are those that see the internet as an outlet to express themselves, and those that see the internet as an outlet to exchange expression. The former as a blog author of a non-episodic fast blog doesn’t care about wanting to connect and communicate with others–they’re more content with what they can do for themselves.
Compare this to the latter, or #2 as you quoted. If you care in any capacity about making a connection and having an audience, you’d make that extra effort to get them to see things from your point of view. In the context of anime, this includes justifying your like or dislike for a series, and going beyond surface-level binaries like I LIEK or I HAET.
It boils down to this: #1 is essentially very superficial. It might be… entertaining, but is it substantial? Does the author come across as a narcissistic/isolated individual, or one wanting to make bridges across that digital divide? I’m convinced that #2 is, again, the superior way, but if you’re so caught up in wanting to use the argument of “different strokes for different folks”, there’s a chance you might be #1! Let’s not agree to disagree, for once, please. Crowd-pleasing solve-them-alls poison discussions like ingesting a solution of mercury and arsenic would you.
I’ll get to the length issue in a minute because it’s been on my mind too lately but I’d like to express my overwhelming approval of the Slow Blogging Manifesto. Honestly, I’d love to get back to the days of three posts per week and 600 hits a day but I have things to arrange at the moment and a backlog to clear so I don’t think I’ll ever be going back to that in the forseeable future. “I’ll post when I can be arsed” is my mantra now – I’ve always preferred to get the wording exactly how I want it before hitting the publish button, but the feeling is all the stronger now.
The length issue you raised here…I don’t necessarily disagree but while drawing the editorial/episodic line is helpful for keeping things simple, there are a lot of blogs that fall into both or neither rather than one or the other. I saw Bateszi’s (frequently misunderstood) point at the time and I agree with it, as I do with quite a few arguments you raise here. Even so it is generalising too much for my liking…as an aside I thought Otou-san’s Clannad hate posts were flawed in places but not bad. Anyway. The quantity vs quality in terms of word counts is a decent rule of thumb but I wouldn’t rely too heavily on it.
My personal thoughts here are that while it’s obviously necessary to use lots of words to get your point across, there’s a lot to be said for being succinct. With the exception of my Soft Ballet article I’m now writing all my blog’s posts with the target length of less than 1000 words. Why? I think I waffle too much and don’t often have the time or patience to read longer posts from other people any more. Since I write articles that I would want to read if I were in my readers’ shoes, I’m now going for the approach of saying what I want to say in as few words as possible. If I can say the same thing in 800 words as I may have said in 1100 in days gone by I’ll be satisfied with it.
Moving away from that issue I can also see where you’re coming from in terms of viewing at the moment. People are so enthused with watching new things that a year-old series is considered ‘old’ (I’ve watched The Little Norse Prince – now THAT is an old anime!), which I guess doesn’t faze people whose viewing includes very little on DVD. So, I’m rewatching Mushishi. On DVD. Watching the first season of Shana. On DVD. Hell, I’m two episodes into Code Geass…the FIRST season. These days I write about what I feel like writing about, whether it’s the latest anime season or not…purely because it’s a reflection of what I’m watching.
Long comment is long. Apologies.
Ummm…did you even read my comment? My point is that people are incapable of reading even their own minds, yet you accuse me of claiming I can read the minds of others? Try again.
In the meantime, I’ll give you a comment even you can understand.
That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Oh, I’m sorry, is nitpicking to call out an intentional, twice-reinforced blanket statement that’s central to your argument?
Yes, Baka-Raptor, I did read your comment. It seems that you’re incapable of processing low-level logic, so let me simplify it for your dull mind a bit further:
Let me get this straight–you’re utterly convinced that you know what goes in a person’s mind more than they do themselves, right? That would be the only way for your statement to make sense. When I write about why I think Anime Z was good, you seem to be labouring under the delusion of knowing me more than I know myself since my post hoc justification is “speculation at best and utter nonsense at worst”, and you follow up on this statement by supporting it with this as ‘proof’;
So what was that about being unable to read? It’s a 10/10 attempt, but I guess if you’re going to take this seriously then I have no choice but to make you realise that your argument is retarded on a galactic level. Please try again.
Strike two. Perhaps some of your beloved verbosity might penetrate your dunce cap.
["blah blah blah" x 9000]
Now let’s take this step by step:
1. What people think – that’s reality.
If you say you like Anime Z, I’m willing to believe you. If you say you like Anime Z’s characters and plot but dislike its animation, that’s perfectly acceptable. You’re entitled to your opinion. If you’re telling me how you truly feel about a show, I can disagree with your opinion but not its legitimacy. I’m assuming you don’t find any of this controversial.
2. Why people think what they think – that’s speculation at best and utter nonsense at worst.
When you’re trying to explain why you’re thinking what you think, you’re making shit up. It’s that simple. No two ways about it.
Here I’m proceeding under one and only one assumption: you’re not a robot. Do you know your utility function? Do you have quasi-linear preferences and convex indifference curves? What combination of sensorial inputs trigger the electrical and chemical impulses that create the opinion “I like Anime Z”? You can only speculate. Or if you are in fact a robot with well-defined opinion functions, I apologize for being presumptuous.
If this doesn’t make any sense to you, read it again. If it still doesn’t make sense, just ask. If you think I’m professing to be a mind-reader, you’ve clearly fucked something up.
If you’re still not satisfied, link me to any anime blogger’s post that you feel exemplifies non-speculative writing about why somebody thinks what he thinks.
That is the worst form of Loki’s Wager that I’ve ever seen. I’d love to wax philosophy, really, but not when you base it on a shitty fallacy like that one, and definitely not on my anime blog. Nice attempt at drowning me in jargon, though, I’m sure it must’ve sounded really witty when you wrote it out. Too bad your pseudo-intelligence doesn’t work here, eh?
I personally prefer posts that make points without too much details. One of my favourite blog for example (Iwa ni Hana), often uses carefully selected images, concise bullet points and italicising essential ideas. It’s amazing how an article can be so thought-provoking under 300 words, it’s a characteristic I admire and aspire to.
figured out something…
brevity amounts to deductive logic without the actual deductive process.
Lengthy stuff may not have any more coherence than a single paragraph. How many lengthy quotes do we know from novels and movies? It’s simple, some statements are better than others. In this way, post-length is rather arbitrary, because what matters is the statement. gaguri’s mention of Iwa ni Hana is a great example of a blog with non-exhaustive expression.
Seems like some time before this thing gets resolved satisfactorily.